|
The Need for a Revolution
By
Carlos Gustavo Machicado*, La Paz, 22 September 2008.
|
Nowadays everybody in Bolivia talks about revolution and the
first thing that anyone can imagine, and has seen in the last
days, is people fighting and killing each other. I do not want
to talk about that kind of revolutions, instead I will talk
about another revolution that Bolivia should achieve: A
productive revolution in the agricultural sector.
A longstanding question in economics is why some countries are
so much richer than others. GDP per capita in Asia grew during
the
last
four decades at 5.2 percent, in the OECD at 3.3 percent and in
Latin America at 1.2 percent. In fact the performance in Latin
America has been very poor
(see table).
Table
1:
GDP per capita
(US$ at international prices of 1996)
|
|
GDP per capita |
Average Growth |
|
|
1950 |
2000 |
1950-2000 |
|
Argentina |
6430 |
11006 |
1.1 |
|
Bolivia |
2749 |
2724 |
0.0 |
|
Brazil |
1655 |
7190 |
3.0 |
|
Chile |
3367 |
9926 |
2.2 |
|
Colombia |
2208 |
5383 |
1.8 |
|
Ecuador |
1637 |
3486 |
1.5 |
|
Mexico |
2990 |
8762 |
2.2 |
|
Peru |
2488 |
4589 |
1.2 |
|
Paraguay |
2412 |
4684 |
1.4 |
|
Uruguay |
5278 |
9622 |
1.2 |
|
Venezuela |
5908 |
6420 |
0.2 |
|
Average |
3375 |
6707 |
1.4 |
Source: Penn World Table 6.1.
Lucas (2000)
(1)
indicates that the main cause of this disparity is that today’s
poor countries began the process of industrialization much later
and also that this process has been slow. But, what is beneath
industrialization? Beneath industrialization is a process of
structural transformation in the agricultural sector.
Gollin, Parente and Rogerson (2002)
(2)
indicate that productivity growth in agriculture has two major
effects on economic growth. First, since agriculture is the
largest sector in most poor countries, increases in agricultural
productivity have a big direct impact on aggregate output.
Second, by stimulating the movement of resources into
non-agriculture, productivity growth in agriculture can help to
raise the average productivity of the economy.
Let’s take a look at the data. If Bolivia is far behind other
Latin American countries, in terms of GDP per capita, the data
should show that it is because Bolivia did not achieve a
structural transformation in the agricultural sector that could
allow the movement of labor into the non-agricultural sector.
Figure
1:
Labor Share in Agriculture, selected Latin American Countries
It can be seen in the figure that in fact Bolivia has the
largest labor share in agriculture. The decrease in the share
suffered a change in slope in year 1965, but it changed again in
1971, returning to its slow rate of decrease. Notice the even
the Agrarian Reform in 1952 did not represent a structural
transformation in the agricultural sector, as most people think.
Other countries, in particular Chile and Argentina seem to have
started their process of industrialization sooner in the past.
This can be seen by the fact that their labor shares in
agriculture are the smallest. Countries that have succeeded in
increasing productivity in agriculture have experienced
relatively sharp declines in agriculture’s share of GDP.
That is the type of revolution that Bolivia needs. A revolution
in terms of agricultural productivity that could allow
withdrawing labor resources from agriculture and transfer them
to manufacturing or other activities. Only when this is
achieved, will Bolivia be able to start a process of
industrialization. Moreover, now that prices of agricultural
commodities are high, it is the opportunity to introduce
technology into agriculture and transform our subsistence
agriculture into a modern and efficient agriculture.
Did you think that a revolution without deaths could be
possible?
Yes, it is
possible…an economic revolution.
Related articles:
-
Bolivia
back in the international headlines
(*) Researcher at the Institute for
Advanced Development Studies, La Paz, Bolivia. The author
happily receives comments at the following e-mail:
cmachicado@inesad.edu.bo .
(1)
Gollin, Douglas, Stephen L. Parente and Richard Rogerson (2002),
“Structural Transformation and Cross-Country Income
Differences”, Williams College (mimeo).
(2) Lucas, Robert E. (2000), “Some Macroeconomics for the 21st
Century,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), pp. 159-168.
Ó
Institute for Advanced Development Studies 2006. The opinions
expressed in this newsletter are those of the author and do not
necessarily coincide with those of the Institute.
If you would like to receive the Monday Morning
Development
Newsletter by e-mail, please
fill in your information here:
|