|
Tipping Points
By Lykke E. Andersen*,
La Paz,
20
October
2008.
A Tipping Point is the moment when an idea, trend, or social
behavior crosses a threshold, tips, and spreads like wildfire,
the point where something previously rare suddenly becomes
common (1). Fashion is an obvious
example, where certain styles and patterns are virtually unseen
for decades, and then suddenly booms for a couple of years,
after which they fade back into negligence. In many ways, the
rise and fall of ideas resembles the rise and fall of epidemics.
This article will focus on the rise and fall (and rise and fall)
of climate change concerns.
During the last 100 years, we have experienced four rounds of
significant climate change. In 1912, when Titanic struck an
iceberg and sunk, the New York Times reported that “Prof.
Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age.” Los Angeles
Times the same year: “Fifth ice age is on the way. Human
race will have to fight for its existence against cold.” Global
temperatures were indeed unusually cold during the first decades
of the previous century, and ice age warnings regularly popped
up in the media: Los Angeles Times, 1923: “The
possibility of another Ice Age already having started… is
admitted by men of first rank in the scientific world, men
specially qualified to speak.” Chicago Tribune, 1923:
“Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada.”
But then temperatures started increasing for a while, and the
media started warning about warming instead. Los Angeles
Times, 1929: “Most geologists think the world is growing
warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer.” New York
Times, 1933 “America in Longest Warm Spell since 1776.
Temperature line records a 25-year rise.” In 1938, British
amateur meteorologist G. S. Callendar made the now familiar
claim, in the Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological
Society, that man was responsible for heating up the planet with
carbon dioxide emissions.
Before the media grew frantic, however, temperatures started
falling again. Although average temperatures fell by less than
half a degree Celsius, both scientists and media found
sufficient reason for doomsday warnings. New York times,
1974: “the facts of the present climate change are such that the
most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major
crop failure in a decade,” If policy makers did not take
immediate action “mass deaths by starvation and probably in
anarchy and violence” would result. Newsweek, 1975:
“"There are ominous signs that the earth's weather patterns have
begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend
a drastic decline in food production -- with serious political
implications for just about every nation on earth.” Nigel
Calder, 1975: “The threat of a new ice age must now stand
alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and
misery for mankind.” Lowell Ponte, 1976: “The cooling has
already killed hundreds of thousands of people in poor nations.”
If proper measures weren’t taken, then the cooling would lead to
“world famine, world chaos, and probably world war, and this
could all come by the year 2000.”
But by that time temperatures had already started increasing
again, and during the last couple of decades global warming has
replaced the media’s ice age claims. I don’t remember the
earlier episodes of climate change concerns, but this time
around the concerns seem to have reached much farther and deeper
than before. After the the release of Al Gore’s movie “An
Inconvenient Truth” in 2006 and the publication of the Fourth
Assessment Report of the IPCC in 2007, the worries about
catastrophic man-made global warming had become almost universal.
The fact that the topic of the 2007 United Nations Human
Development Report was Global Warming, and the theme of the 2010
World Bank Global Development Report will be on Development in a
Changing Climate suggests that this issue is of highest concern
worldwide.
We are probably not quite ready for a mayor global cooling scare
yet, but I think the Global Warming scare is likely to go out of
fashion soon. Too bad, because it made for some
spectacular
consulting contracts. Maybe we can keep
running computer simulations and ignore the real data for a
couple of years more?
|